MMPC-001 Solved Assignments 2024-25

Description

MMPC-001 Solved Assignments 2024-25 Available

Read the following case study carefully.
XYZ Corporation: Navigating Through Change
XYZ Corporation is a mid-sized company specializing in consumer electronics. Over the past decade, XYZ Corporation has seen significant growth due to its innovative products and strong market presence. However, recent changes in the market, increased competition, and technological advancements have put pressure on the company to adapt and evolve. The company’s CEO, Mr. Rajesh Kumar, has decided to implement a series of strategic changes to maintain the company’s competitive edge. These changes include:
 Restructuring the organization to improve efficiency.
 Introducing new technology to enhance product development.
 Expanding into new international markets.
 Developing a stronger online presence.
Questions:
a. Management Functions:
1. Identify and describe the four fundamental functions of management as they pertain to the case study.
2. Provide specific examples from the case study where XYZ Corporation demonstrates
each of these functions.
b. Management Theories:
1. Select two management theories and explain their relevance to the changes being implemented at XYZ Corporation.
2. Discuss how these theories can be applied to enhance the effectiveness of XYZ Corporation’s management strategy.
c. Leadership Styles:
1. Analyze the leadership style of CEO Mr. Rajesh Kumar based on the case study. Is he more of an autocratic, democratic, or laissez-faire leader? Provide evidence from the case study to support your analysis.
2. Recommend an alternative leadership style or approach that might be effective for XYZ
Corporation in navigating through these changes. Justify your recommendation.
d. Change Management:
1. Discuss the challenges that XYZ Corporation might face in implementing these strategic changes. How can the management team address employee resistance to change?
2. Propose a change management model that would be appropriate for XYZ Corporation. Explain how the chosen model can be applied in this scenario.
Format:
Your analysis should be 3,000 to 4,000 words in length.
Evaluation Criteria:
o Demonstration of understanding of management functions and theories.
o Application of theories to the case study.
o Quality and depth of analysis.
o Clarity of communication and organization of content.
Note: You are encouraged to use additional resources and real-world examples to support your
analysis. Critical thinking and originality will be highly valued in your responses.
Grading Rubric:
Criterion (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
Understanding
of Management
Functions
Demonstrates
thorough
understanding
with clear,
detailed
examples from
the case study.
Demonstrates
good
understanding
with relevant
examples.
Demonstrates
basic
understanding
with some
examples.
Shows limited
understanding
with few or no
examples.
Lacks
understanding
and does not
provide
relevant
examples.
Application of
Management
Theories
Skillfully
applies theories
to case study
with deep
insight and
relevance.
Applies
theories well
with good
relevance.
Applies
theories with
some
relevance.
Limited
application of
theories with
minimal
relevance.
Fails to apply
theories or
does so
inaccurately.
Leadership
Style Analysis
Provides
insightful and
well-supported
analysis of
Provides a
well-supported
analysis with
good evidence.
Provides a
basic analysis
with some
supporting
Provides a
weak analysis
with little
supporting
Fails to
analyze or
provides an
inaccurate
Criterion (A) (B) (C) (D) (E)
leadership style
with strong
evidence.
evidence. evidence. analysis.
Change
Management
Proposal
Proposes a
highly effective
model with
clear, relevant
application to
the case study.
Proposes an
effective
model with
good
application.
Proposes a
model with
some
relevance and
application.
Proposes a
model with
limited
relevance and
application.
Fails to
propose an
appropriate
model or does
so
inaccurately.
Communication
and
Organization
Exceptionally
clear, wellorganized, and
engaging
writing with no
errors.
Clear and
well-organized
writing with
minimal
errors.
Satisfactory
writing with
some
organization
and few errors.
Poorly
organized
writing with
several errors.
Unclear and
disorganized
writing with
many errors.